Skip to content

Smart Solo Data Formatted as PH5 Contains Duplicated Traces #485

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
timronan opened this issue Oct 1, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Smart Solo Data Formatted as PH5 Contains Duplicated Traces #485

timronan opened this issue Oct 1, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
discussion GeoHDF Things to consider for GeoHDF

Comments

@timronan
Copy link
Collaborator

timronan commented Oct 1, 2021

In expirment 21-002, 9N 2020, running:
ph5toms -n master.ph5 -p . -s 2020-11-07T18:14:00 -t 2020-11-07T18:16:00 --station 8010 --channel GPZ
leads to an output miniseed that contains:

9N.8010..GPZ | 2020-11-07T18:14:00.000000Z - 2020-11-07T18:15:59.999000Z | 1000.0 Hz, 120000 samples
9N.8010..GPZ | 2020-11-07T18:14:18.000000Z - 2020-11-07T18:15:59.999000Z | 1000.0 Hz, 102000 samples

This seems to be occurring because Smart Solo data does not have a zero padded buffer between epochs.

@hrotman-pic
Copy link
Collaborator

I ran this command on the 21-002 archive rebuilt from SEGD that was newly written out in July of 2022. The replacement was submitted in September 2022.
ph5toms -n master.ph5 -s 2020-11-07T18:14:00 -t 2020-11-07T18:16:00 --station 8010 --channel GPZ -o mseed_test8010 -F MSEED

Miniseed output:
mseed_test8010$ msi -S *ms
DCC|2023,037
9N|8010||GPZ|2020,312,18:14:00.000000|2020,312,18:15:59.999000||1000|120000|||||||2023,037

Potentially, this duplication is fixed. I can do more spot checks on the first SmartSolo experiments and if they show the same I think we could close this as resolved by changes to SmartSolo SEGD writeout?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
discussion GeoHDF Things to consider for GeoHDF
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants