Skip to content

feat: Is the user having to disable battery optimization really necesary? #2577

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
3 tasks done
GerbillLife opened this issue May 29, 2025 · 0 comments
Open
3 tasks done

feat: Is the user having to disable battery optimization really necesary? #2577

GerbillLife opened this issue May 29, 2025 · 0 comments
Labels
Feature request Requesting a new feature that's not implemented yet

Comments

@GerbillLife
Copy link

GerbillLife commented May 29, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Feature description

I don't think asking the user to disable battery optimizations for ReVanced Manager is necessary.

Motivation

ReVanced Manager uses a background service for patching.

Acknowledgements

  • I have checked all open and closed feature requests and this is not a duplicate.
  • I have chosen an appropriate title.
  • The feature request is only related to ReVanced Manager.
@GerbillLife GerbillLife added the Feature request Requesting a new feature that's not implemented yet label May 29, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Feature request Requesting a new feature that's not implemented yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@GerbillLife