Search results

Validation criteria: <code>verify_strict</code> might be accepting non-canonical <code>R</code>

do-for-2.0This should be resolved before a 2.0 releaseThis should be resolved before a 2.0 release

Status: Open.

#267 In dalek-cryptography/ed25519-dalek;

· rozbb opened on Jan 17, 2023

KaTeX not rendering properly

do-for-2.0This should be resolved before a 2.0 releaseThis should be resolved before a 2.0 release

Status: Open.

#248 In dalek-cryptography/ed25519-dalek;

· rozbb opened on Dec 20, 2022

Merlin dep is broken on big-endian machines

do-for-2.0This should be resolved before a 2.0 releaseThis should be resolved before a 2.0 release

Status: Open.

#228 In dalek-cryptography/ed25519-dalek;

· rozbb opened on Nov 21, 2022

verify_prehashed seems unnecessarily strict

do-for-2.0This should be resolved before a 2.0 releaseThis should be resolved before a 2.0 release

Status: Open.

#190 In dalek-cryptography/ed25519-dalek;

· rpcesar opened on Feb 6, 2022

No documentation on byte layout or formatting

do-for-2.0This should be resolved before a 2.0 releaseThis should be resolved before a 2.0 release

Status: Open.

#171 In dalek-cryptography/ed25519-dalek;

· ShadowJonathan opened on May 20, 2021

Ed25519 malleability vs libsodium

do-for-2.0This should be resolved before a 2.0 releaseThis should be resolved before a 2.0 release

Status: Open.

#20 In dalek-cryptography/ed25519-dalek;

· aep opened on Apr 29, 2018