Don't stop pools

When there are multiple pool instances controlling the same components
and one of them stops, that would stop all the pools.

This commit adds an emergency fix to prevent this bug, to buy some
time to come up with a better solution.

Signed-off-by: Sahas Subramanian <[email protected]>

Author: shsms

src/frequenz/sdk/timeseries/battery_pool/_battery_pool.py

@@ -399,4 +399,9 @@ def _system_power_bounds(self) -> ReceiverFetcher[SystemBounds]:
 
     async def stop(self) -> None:
         """Stop all tasks and channels owned by the BatteryPool."""
-        await self._pool_ref_store.stop()
+        # This was closing the pool_ref_store, which is not correct, because those are
+        # shared.
+        #
+        # This method will do until we have a mechanism to track the resources created
+        # through it.  It can also eventually cleanup the pool_ref_store, when it is
+        # holding the last reference to it.

src/frequenz/sdk/timeseries/ev_charger_pool/_ev_charger_pool.py

@@ -217,7 +217,12 @@ def power_distribution_results(self) -> ReceiverFetcher[_power_distributing.Resu
 
     async def stop(self) -> None:
         """Stop all tasks and channels owned by the EVChargerPool."""
-        await self._pool_ref_store.stop()
+        # This was closing the pool_ref_store, which is not correct, because those are
+        # shared.
+        #
+        # This method will do until we have a mechanism to track the resources created
+        # through it.  It can also eventually cleanup the pool_ref_store, when it is
+        # holding the last reference to it.
 
     @property
     def _system_power_bounds(self) -> ReceiverFetcher[SystemBounds]:

src/frequenz/sdk/timeseries/pv_pool/_pv_pool.py

@@ -179,7 +179,12 @@ def power_distribution_results(self) -> ReceiverFetcher[_power_distributing.Resu
 
     async def stop(self) -> None:
         """Stop all tasks and channels owned by the PVPool."""
-        await self._pool_ref_store.stop()
+        # This was closing the pool_ref_store, which is not correct, because those are
+        # shared.
+        #
+        # This method will do until we have a mechanism to track the resources created
+        # through it.  It can also eventually cleanup the pool_ref_store, when it is
+        # holding the last reference to it.
 
     @property
     def _system_power_bounds(self) -> ReceiverFetcher[SystemBounds]: