Replies: 2 comments
-
I'm voting for an empty dict. Its important that apps know that the config vars are gone and thus the actors are suppose to fallback to their defaults (default behaviour). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Created an issue about it (#972). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Right now the
ConfigManagingActor
is monitoring for delete events, but ignoring them, which doesn't seem very reasonable.I guess if a config file was removed we could signal that by sending either an empty
dict
orNone
. If we really want to ignore deletions, then maybe we shouldn't monitor for create and delete events.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions