Replies: 1 comment
-
Yes, nothing prevents you from creating the hash map without an internal mutex (use the default You can also use |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
If I'm doing 1000s of lookups into the hash map in a loop is there a way to have a single read mutex that can encapsulate the loop instead of getting a mutex for each find()?
Thanks
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions