You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Every commit to master results in a new build of the website, which gets pushed to the gh-pages.
A single build of the website is pretty heavy (several hundreds of Mb, according to @barroco).
As a result, the size of the repository quickly grows, which might slowly become a hassle and a potential barrier to contributions.
This issue is here to discuss possible approaches.
Note: a repository with only the main branch and its entire history weights about ~23M
Options
as a first fix, we may simply delete the history on the gh-pages branch
updating the website with each commit is a feature we want to likely keep. We could chose to drop the history on that branch, always ensuring it has a single commit
if keeping the history of the website is important, we could push it to a separate repository
Other option proposals are welcome.
Current plan
(Possibly don't do this) fork the monitoring repo into the interuss organization, call it "monitoring-gh-pages-archive", only keep the gh-pages branch.
on monitoring, in the relevant github action:
(Possibly don't do this) push updates to the gh-pages branch to the archive repo rather than monitoring
force-push a single commit containing the current version of the website to the gh-pages branch on the monitoring repo
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Every commit to master results in a new build of the website, which gets pushed to the gh-pages.
A single build of the website is pretty heavy (several hundreds of Mb, according to @barroco).
As a result, the size of the repository quickly grows, which might slowly become a hassle and a potential barrier to contributions.
This issue is here to discuss possible approaches.
Note: a repository with only the
main
branch and its entire history weights about ~23MOptions
gh-pages
branchOther option proposals are welcome.
Current plan
gh-pages
branch.monitoring
, in the relevant github action:gh-pages
branch to the archive repo rather thanmonitoring
gh-pages
branch on themonitoring
repoThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: