Skip to content

new maintainers / transferring to a group? #96

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
stapelberg opened this issue Feb 27, 2025 · 4 comments
Open

new maintainers / transferring to a group? #96

stapelberg opened this issue Feb 27, 2025 · 4 comments

Comments

@stapelberg
Copy link

Hey @mcuadros, thank you for publishing this package! As you don’t seem to be active in the project anymore, I was wondering if you would accept a co-maintainer to help address open issues? Or perhaps would you be open to transfer the repository to a (to-be-created) GitHub org to make it independent of your name?

I would be happy to help (as time permits) and have some experience with this role (check my GitHub profile), for example with http://github.com/jacobsa/fuse/, which I am co-maintaining.

@mcuadros
Copy link
Owner

@stapelberg are you still interested on main this repository?

@stapelberg
Copy link
Author

Hey @mcuadros, yes, I would still be interested

@mfreeman451
Copy link

I would be weary of taking on any new maintainers that haven't already had a long history/role in contributing to the project. This smells like something we have all seen before in xz utils backdoor incident, no offense to you @stapelberg maybe you're real.. but maybe you aren't.

@stapelberg
Copy link
Author

You can look at https://michael.stapelberg.ch/ and https://github.com/stapelberg/ to get a sense of how real I am :)

I am contributing to Go in one way or another for 10+ years, since a while also professionally, see for example https://go.dev/blog/protobuf-opaque for proof.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants