You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Aaron points out that it's a bit unclear that some checkboxes are just going to control parameter visibility. It would be good to have them rendered as "dropdown rectangles", and possibly have distinctive typography, and/or used displayed names like "Show animation controls" instead of just "Animation controls".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This also came up in my brother's playing with Numberscope (#510 (comment)). I think there are two semantically distinct things we are currently using the checkboxes for: (1) show more parameters (2) activate/toggle a behaviour. I think these should be de-coupled. We discussed having a toggle switch like for list/thumbnail view when it is activating a behaviour, and a dropdown arrow for hidden parameters.
Aaron points out that it's a bit unclear that some checkboxes are just going to control parameter visibility. It would be good to have them rendered as "dropdown rectangles", and possibly have distinctive typography, and/or used displayed names like "Show animation controls" instead of just "Animation controls".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: