Skip to content

Non-masked "variables" object to complement "secrets" #35219

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
rarkins opened this issue Apr 7, 2025 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #35350
Open

Non-masked "variables" object to complement "secrets" #35219

rarkins opened this issue Apr 7, 2025 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #35350
Assignees
Labels
core:config Related to config capabilities and presets priority-3-medium Default priority, "should be done" but isn't prioritised ahead of others

Comments

@rarkins
Copy link
Collaborator

rarkins commented Apr 7, 2025

Describe the proposed change(s).

Create a new configuration option called "variables" which behaves the same way as secrets except that its values are not masked in logs. It should be available in templates like this: {{ variables.FOO }}.

It is OK - but not recommended - for variables to have the same name as secrets.

@rarkins rarkins added core:config Related to config capabilities and presets priority-3-medium Default priority, "should be done" but isn't prioritised ahead of others labels Apr 7, 2025
@RahulGautamSingh
Copy link
Collaborator

global only?

@rarkins
Copy link
Collaborator Author

rarkins commented Apr 9, 2025

I can't think of any use case where making it repo-based is useful, so let's keep it as global only

@RahulGautamSingh RahulGautamSingh linked a pull request Apr 13, 2025 that will close this issue
6 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core:config Related to config capabilities and presets priority-3-medium Default priority, "should be done" but isn't prioritised ahead of others
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants