Problem: naming clash between SRF-20 tokenID and ERC-721 tokenId

[PaulRBerg]

As discussed here, we intend to use the vanilla ERC-721 for NFTs on SabVM.

That means that there will be a naming conflict between the SRF-20 tokenID (see the implementation in this repo) and the ERC-721 tokenId.

I don't know what the solution is. I opened this discussion just to raise awareness about the problem.

[IaroslavMazur]

The difference in the contexts in which the 2 "token id" terms above are used should be enough to make them distinguishable (semantics-wise) from one another, imo.