First pass at simplifying PCMDI-AMIP docs (#220) #221
Conversation
|
No changes to the database between 'main' branch and 69f3e8a |
|
No changes to the database between 'main' branch and 4fd5397 |
|
No changes to the database between 'main' branch and 09e3f84 |
|
@johndunne13 does this change reflect the format that you were thinking? (ref #222) |
| ## Key contacts | ||
|
|
||
| - Names: Paul Durack | ||
| - Names: Paul J. Durack | ||
| - Emails: [email protected] | ||
|
|
||
| ## Summary | ||
|
|
||
| <!--- begin-cmip7-phases-source-ids --> | ||
| <!--- Do not edit this section, it is automatically updated when the docs are built --> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@durack1 I'm guessing you missed this. Can you please move all the text you wrote out of the section boundaries or update the code which auto-generates this text
There was a problem hiding this comment.
ha ha, where is the code? This is one of those examples of keep it simple that has tripped me up, and I would consider myself a "sophisticated" user..
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is one of those examples of keep it simple that has tripped me up, and I would consider myself a "sophisticated" user
I know it's not a use case you're used to, and that is causing issues, but what I'm doing is definitely not sophisticated.
If you just move the bespoke text out of that block (leave the changes that actually need to change the template), I can also do the auto-generating updates.
Have a look at Margreet's if you want to see how to split the long text from the key info https://input4mips-cvs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/dataset-overviews/open-biomass-burning-emissions/
| - Emails: [email protected] | ||
|
|
||
| ## Summary | ||
|
|
||
| <!--- begin-cmip7-phases-source-ids --> | ||
| <!--- Do not edit this section, it is automatically updated when the docs are built --> | ||
| ### Source IDs for CMIP7 phases | ||
| ### Source IDs for CMIP phases |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would leave this as CMIP7, as we're not going to start providing information about CMIP5 or CMIP6 here (at least not in the short term)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We already have CMIP7 and CMIP6Plus as headings on the page further down.. So happy to iterate
|
|
||
| For the CMIP7 AR7 fast track phase of CMIP7, use data with the source ID [PCMDI-AMIP-1-1-9](https://aims2.llnl.gov/search?project=input4MIPs&versionType=all&&activeFacets=%7B%22source_id%22%3A%5B%22PCMDI-AMIP-1-1-9%22%5D%7D) | ||
| **an issue has been identified in the PCMDI-AMIP-1-1-9 sea ice field for the dataset last month (2022-12). | ||
| A resolution is currently being investigated, and a revised dataset `PCMDI-AMIP-1-1-10` will be made available |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would shift this above the auto-generated section, given how key it is
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The auto-generated bit is something I didn't get - the content is what I was keen to update
This PR is a quick pass at attempting to streamline information presented in the PCMDI-AMIP documentation page.
The key point, is that the granularity (that is not very well defined) about AR7 Fast Track is removed in the below.
This particular case is an excellent example to ponder, as data bugs (admittedly a small issue, of a problem with the last timestep in the siconc/siconcbcs last month) are an issue that has prevented the dataset being incremented with a
mip_era = CMIP7, an example that we'll likely see repeated into the coming months.@vnaik60 it might be useful to ping this example to the folks who you've been interacting with to see if such information hits the mark, is vague or confusing.. Admittedly this
amipdataset is one of the more simple ones, as it's a single-experiment use (CMIP7:CMIP:amip).@znichollscr @vnaik60 @eleanororourke pinging you all for feedback.