[BugFix] Deletion task failed when using datetime as a deletion predicate #58933
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: sevev <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: sevev <[email protected]>
wyb
previously approved these changes
May 16, 2025
silverbullet233
previously approved these changes
May 19, 2025
Signed-off-by: sevev <[email protected]>
[FE Incremental Coverage Report]✅ pass : 0 / 0 (0%) |
[Java-Extensions Incremental Coverage Report]✅ pass : 0 / 0 (0%) |
[BE Incremental Coverage Report]✅ pass : 0 / 0 (0%) |
wyb
approved these changes
May 19, 2025
silverbullet233
approved these changes
May 19, 2025
|
@Mergifyio backport branch-3.5 |
|
@Mergifyio backport branch-3.4 |
|
@Mergifyio backport branch-3.3 |
✅ Backports have been created
|
✅ Backports have been created
|
✅ Backports have been created
|
mergify bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 19, 2025
…cate (#58933) Signed-off-by: sevev <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit ff9d27f)
Merged
24 tasks
mergify bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 19, 2025
…cate (#58933) Signed-off-by: sevev <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit ff9d27f)
Merged
24 tasks
mergify bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 19, 2025
…cate (#58933) Signed-off-by: sevev <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit ff9d27f)
Merged
24 tasks
wanpengfei-git
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 19, 2025
…cate (backport #58933) (#59094) Signed-off-by: sevev <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: zhangqiang <[email protected]>
wanpengfei-git
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 19, 2025
…cate (backport #58933) (#59095) Signed-off-by: sevev <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: zhangqiang <[email protected]>
wanpengfei-git
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 20, 2025
…cate (backport #58933) (#59096) Signed-off-by: sevev <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: zhangqiang <[email protected]>
Mesut-Doner
pushed a commit
to Mesut-Doner/starrocks
that referenced
this pull request
May 21, 2025
…cate (StarRocks#58933) Signed-off-by: sevev <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why I'm doing:
Since version 3.3.5, the datetime type supports millisecond precision, but deletion operations fail when using datetime values with millisecond precision as deletion predicates.
The reason is that BE doesn't support millisecond precision when validating datetime legality.
What I'm doing:
BE support millisecond precision for datetime legality
Fixes #issue
What type of PR is this:
Does this PR entail a change in behavior?
If yes, please specify the type of change:
Checklist:
Bugfix cherry-pick branch check: