This project is a learning-focused C++ repository that prioritizes educational value and code safety. We maintain security best practices while ensuring examples remain accessible to learners.
- Code Safety: Preventing undefined behavior and memory issues
- Input Validation: Safe handling of user input in examples
- Educational Security: Teaching secure coding practices
- Responsible Disclosure: Proper handling of security concerns
If you discover a security vulnerability in this project, please report it responsibly:
- DO NOT create a public GitHub issue for security vulnerabilities
- DO email security concerns to: [[email protected]]
- DO include detailed information about the vulnerability
- DO allow time for investigation and response
- Description: Clear explanation of the security issue
- Location: Specific file(s) and line numbers affected
- Impact: How the vulnerability could be exploited
- Reproduction: Steps to reproduce the issue
- Suggested Fix: If you have a solution in mind
- Educational Context: How this affects learning objectives
- Initial Response: Within 48 hours
- Investigation: 1-2 weeks for thorough analysis
- Fix Implementation: 1-4 weeks depending on complexity
- Public Disclosure: After fix is implemented and tested
- Buffer overflows in examples
- Use-after-free scenarios
- Memory leaks that could be exploited
- Uninitialized variable usage
- Unsafe string handling
- Integer overflow vulnerabilities
- Format string vulnerabilities
- Path traversal in file operations
- Examples that teach unsafe practices
- Code that could be misused maliciously
- Missing bounds checking in educational examples
- Potential undefined behavior
- Unsafe type conversions
- Missing error handling
- Inconsistent exception safety
- Missing security warnings in comments
- Incomplete error handling documentation
- Lack of input validation guidance
- Code style that could lead to security issues
- Missing const correctness
- Inconsistent error handling patterns
// β
Good: RAII and smart pointers
auto data = std::make_unique<std::vector<int>>();
std::vector<std::string> safe_strings;
// β
Good: Bounds checking
if (index < container.size()) {
auto value = container[index];
}
// β
Good: Validate input before use
std::string process_input(const std::string& input) {
if (input.empty() || input.length() > MAX_LENGTH) {
throw std::invalid_argument("Invalid input");
}
return input;
}
// β
Good: Exception-safe operations
class SafeContainer {
public:
void add_item(const std::string& item) {
auto new_items = items; // Copy first
new_items.push_back(item); // Modify copy
items = std::move(new_items); // Commit if successful
}
private:
std::vector<std::string> items;
};
// β Avoid: Raw pointers without RAII
int* data = new int[100];
// ... use data ...
// Missing delete[] - memory leak!
// β Avoid: No bounds checking
int value = array[index]; // Could be out of bounds
// β Avoid: Unsafe string operations
char buffer[100];
strcpy(buffer, user_input); // Potential buffer overflow
Chapter 5: Basic Language Features
- Safe initialization and declaration
- Proper scope management
- Exception handling basics
Chapter 6: Functions
- Parameter validation
- Return value safety
- Reference parameter safety
Chapter 7: Classes
- RAII principles
- Exception safety guarantees
- Resource management
Chapter 8: I/O Streams
- Input validation
- File operation safety
- Error handling in streams
Chapter 9: Containers and Strings
- Iterator safety
- Container bounds checking
- String manipulation safety
Chapter 10: Generic Algorithms
- Safe algorithm usage
- Iterator validation
- Lambda expression safety
// β
Good: Safe, educational example
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <stdexcept>
class SafeExample {
public:
// Validate input in constructor
SafeExample(const std::string& data)
: data_(validate_input(data)) {}
// Safe access with bounds checking
char get_char(size_t index) const {
if (index >= data_.length()) {
throw std::out_of_range("Index out of bounds");
}
return data_[index];
}
private:
std::string data_;
// Input validation helper
static std::string validate_input(const std::string& input) {
if (input.empty()) {
throw std::invalid_argument("Input cannot be empty");
}
if (input.length() > MAX_LENGTH) {
throw std::invalid_argument("Input too long");
}
return input;
}
static constexpr size_t MAX_LENGTH = 1000;
};
# Test with security-focused flags
g++ -std=c++20 -Wall -Wextra -Werror -fsanitize=address,undefined main.cpp -o main
# Test with additional security checks
g++ -std=c++20 -Wall -Wextra -Werror -fstack-protector-strong main.cpp -o main
- AddressSanitizer: Detect memory errors
- UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: Catch undefined behavior
- Valgrind: Memory leak detection
- Static Analysis: Use tools like clang-tidy
- Memory Safety: No memory leaks or undefined behavior
- Input Validation: All user input is validated
- Bounds Checking: Array/container access is bounds-checked
- Exception Safety: Proper exception handling
- Resource Management: RAII principles followed
- Error Handling: Graceful error handling throughout
- Documentation: Security considerations documented
- Code designed to exploit vulnerabilities
- Examples that could be used for attacks
- Code that demonstrates unsafe practices without warnings
- Raw pointer manipulation without RAII
- Unsafe string operations
- Unchecked array access
- Unsafe type conversions
- Examples that teach incorrect security practices
- Code that appears safe but has hidden vulnerabilities
- Missing security warnings in dangerous examples
- Assessment: Evaluate the severity and impact
- Fix Development: Create a secure solution
- Testing: Thorough testing with security tools
- Documentation: Update comments and README files
- Educational Review: Ensure fix teaches good practices
- Deployment: Apply fix and update examples
When security issues are fixed, we also:
- Update Comments: Explain why the fix is necessary
- Add Warnings: Highlight common security pitfalls
- Improve Examples: Show both wrong and right approaches
- Update Documentation: Include security considerations
- Be Respectful: Report issues constructively
- Be Specific: Provide detailed, actionable information
- Be Patient: Allow time for proper investigation
- Be Educational: Help others learn from the issue
When security issues are resolved:
- Document the Problem: Explain what went wrong
- Show the Fix: Demonstrate the correct approach
- Explain the Why: Help learners understand the reasoning
- Prevent Future Issues: Add checks to prevent similar problems
- Security Email: [[email protected]]
- Response Time: Within 48 hours
- Public Issues: Use GitHub issues for non-security concerns
- Community: Join discussions in GitHub discussions
- Project Maintainer: Primary security contact
- Community Moderators: Help with security discussions
- Contributors: Report issues through proper channels
Thank you for helping keep this learning project secure! π‘οΈ
"Security is not just about preventing attacks, but about teaching safe coding practices."
Your security reports help create a safer learning environment for all C++ developers.