Support LDAPGroupProvider

[wheatxiong]

Why are the changes needed?

#3897 had exposed GroupProvider, we implement LDAPGroupProvider to special group mapping mechanisms through LDAP

How was this patch tested?

• Add some test cases that check the changes thoroughly including negative and positive cases if possible

• Add screenshots for manual tests if appropriate

• Run test locally before make a pull request

[pan3793]

Hi @wheatxiong, the Apache GitHub repo requires the first contributors to run CI after approving, you can send a small PR to unlock it, e.g. #3965

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #4001 (f7e8843) into master (7631e7d) will increase coverage by 52.95%.
The diff coverage is 38.88%.

❗ Current head f7e8843 differs from pull request most recent head 34ec82f. Consider uploading reports for the commit 34ec82f to get more accurate results

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #4001       +/-   ##
=============================================
+ Coverage      0.00%   52.95%   +52.95%     
- Complexity        0       13       +13     
=============================================
  Files           564      548       -16     
  Lines         31311    29931     -1380     
  Branches       4098     4004       -94     
=============================================
+ Hits              0    15850    +15850     
+ Misses        31311    12618    -18693     
- Partials          0     1463     +1463     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
.../org/apache/kyuubi/session/LDAPGroupProvider.scala	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...in/scala/org/apache/kyuubi/config/KyuubiConf.scala	97.34% <97.22%> (+97.34%)	⬆️

... and 554 files with indirect coverage changes

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[wheatxiong]

Hi @wheatxiong, the Apache GitHub repo requires the first contributors to run CI after approving, you can send a small PR to unlock it, e.g. #3965

OK, i get it

[wheatxiong]

@pan3793 Please help to review this pr to prevent ugly code, thanks

[pan3793]

@wheatxiong sorry for the late reply, I'm working on #4152 which mainly referring the Hive codebase. AFAIK, the Hive ecosystem w/ LDAP is mature, let's keep the same behavior(configuration name and logic) w/ Hive LDAP unless the new design has significant advantages.

[wheatxiong]

@wheatxiong sorry for the late reply, I'm working on #4152 which mainly referring the Hive codebase. AFAIK, the Hive ecosystem w/ LDAP is mature, let's keep the same behavior(configuration name and logic) w/ Hive LDAP unless the new design has significant advantages.

thanks, i will refer to the implementation of HIVE

[nqvuong1998]

Hi @wheatxiong @pan3793 , any update for LDAP group provider feature?