Skip to content

Add XLoader image to run in it's own container, separate from the CKAN UI container #76

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 13 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

kowh-ai
Copy link
Contributor

@kowh-ai kowh-ai commented Jul 23, 2024

Fixes #66

This PR creates an XLoader image to be used as a replacement for DataPusher.

This XLoader PR was merged recently: Feature/custom xloader site url rebased which implemented a new config option ckanext.xloader.site_url that allowed XLoader to communicate back to the CKAN UI container running in a Docker network

Dockerfile, Makefile and setup process
@kowh-ai kowh-ai changed the title Add XLoader image to run in it's own container seperate from the CKAN UI container Add XLoader image to run in it's own container, separate from the CKAN UI container Jul 23, 2024
@kowh-ai kowh-ai marked this pull request as draft July 23, 2024 12:50
@amercader
Copy link
Member

This shouldn't be difficult to implement in xloader, I've put down the work needed here:

ckan/ckanext-xloader#226

@ThrawnCA
Copy link

ThrawnCA commented Mar 5, 2025

It seems suboptimal for the CKAN site URL to be localhost...isn't there any better alternative?

@kowh-ai kowh-ai marked this pull request as ready for review March 20, 2025 02:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Investigate best practices for creating an XLoader Docker image + subsequent CKAN (worker) container
3 participants