Skip to content

feat: update collaborate doc #2688

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 26, 2025
Merged

feat: update collaborate doc #2688

merged 1 commit into from
May 26, 2025

Conversation

MrKou47
Copy link
Member

@MrKou47 MrKou47 commented May 23, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Clarified permission levels and member management process in both English and Chinese documentation.
    • Expanded details on project invitation links, including validity period and joining instructions.
    • Added notes about the current lack of simultaneous multi-user editing and plans for future support.
    • Introduced a callout highlighting the maximum of 5 collaborators per project.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 23, 2025

Walkthrough

The documentation for the member management interface was updated in both English and Chinese. The revisions clarify permission levels, elaborate on the process of inviting members via a project link, specify invitation validity, and add notes about collaboration limits and future support for simultaneous editing. Visual and stylistic adjustments were also made.

Changes

Files Change Summary
docs/en/interface/sidebar.mdx Updated member management section: clarified permission levels, expanded invitation process, added notes on editing and collaborator limits.
docs/zh/interface/sidebar.mdx Revised member management section: clarified permissions, detailed invitation process, added notices on editing, collaborator limits, and image style adjustment.

Poem

In the warren of docs, permissions are clear,
Invite with a link, collaborators draw near.
Seven days to join, five friends at most,
Future edits together—soon we will boast!
For now, take a peek, at what’s new and neat,
Bunny-approved updates—documentation’s treat! 🥕

Note

⚡️ AI Code Reviews for VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf

CodeRabbit now has a plugin for VS Code, Cursor and Windsurf. This brings AI code reviews directly in the code editor. Each commit is reviewed immediately, finding bugs before the PR is raised. Seamless context handoff to your AI code agent ensures that you can easily incorporate review feedback.
Learn more here.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label May 23, 2025
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
docs/en/interface/sidebar.mdx (3)

44-45: Grammar and clarity: adjust possessive and pronouns for consistency.

The sentence "After successfully adding them, you can still edit the member's permission levels or remove the member." uses singular possessive; consider pluralizing and streamlining pronouns. For example:

- After successfully adding them, you can still edit the member's permission levels or remove the member.
+ After successfully adding members, you can still edit their permission levels or remove them.

46-47: Consider using a callout for the editing limitation.

This note about lack of simultaneous editing is important for users. Wrapping it in a callout will improve visibility:

- Please note that we currently do not support multiple users editing the same project simultaneously. We will support collaborative editing in future versions.
+ <Callout type="info">
+ We currently do not support multiple users editing the same project simultaneously. Collaborative editing will be available in a future version.
+ </Callout>

48-49: Specify a callout type to emphasize the collaborator limit.

To align with other callouts and highlight the 5-collaborator cap, consider adding a type attribute, e.g.:

- <Callout>Each project can have a maximum of 5 collaborators</Callout>
+ <Callout type="warning">Each project can have a maximum of 5 collaborators</Callout>
docs/zh/interface/sidebar.mdx (3)

44-45: 用词和一致性:优化权限描述和代词使用。

“成功添加后,您仍然可以编辑成员的权限等级或移除该成员。” 建议简化代词并一致使用复数形式,例如:

- 成功添加后,您仍然可以编辑成员的权限等级或移除该成员。
+ 成功添加后,您仍可编辑他们的权限等级或将其移除。

46-47: 考虑使用 Callout 提示框强调多用户编辑限制。

这段关于暂不支持多人同时编辑的说明较为重要,可使用提示框提高可见性:

- 请注意,我们目前不支持多人同时编辑同一个项目。我们将在后续版本中支持多人协作编辑。
+ <Callout type="info">
+ 暂不支持多人同时编辑同一个项目,多人协作编辑功能将在后续版本上线。
+ </Callout>

48-49: 统一示例中的 Callout 类型或样式。

建议为 Callout 添加 type 属性以与其他文档风格保持一致,例如:

- <Callout>每个项目最多有 5 名协作者</Callout>
+ <Callout type="warning">每个项目最多有 5 名协作者</Callout>
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5825a21 and e4f6135.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • docs/en/interface/sidebar.mdx (1 hunks)
  • docs/zh/interface/sidebar.mdx (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: e2e (22.x)
  • GitHub Check: codecov
  • GitHub Check: build (22.x, windows-latest)

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 23, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 79.49%. Comparing base (5825a21) to head (e4f6135).
Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2688      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   79.47%   79.49%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         839      839              
  Lines       89263    89263              
  Branches     8775     8782       +7     
==========================================
+ Hits        70938    70963      +25     
+ Misses      18192    18167      -25     
  Partials      133      133              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 79.49% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Collaborator

@cptbtptpbcptdtptp cptbtptpbcptdtptp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

@cptbtptpbcptdtptp cptbtptpbcptdtptp merged commit 2344420 into main May 26, 2025
10 checks passed
@GuoLei1990 GuoLei1990 deleted the doc/collaborate branch May 27, 2025 12:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants