Skip to content

Restore vendoring of cli11 by default #178

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 21, 2025

Conversation

scpeters
Copy link
Member

🦟 Bug fix

Workaround for gazebosim/gz-sim#2918

Summary

Needed to workaround a bug in cli11 2.4.2 and gz-sim-model.

Checklist

  • Signed all commits for DCO
  • Added tests
  • Updated documentation (as needed)
  • Updated migration guide (as needed)
  • Consider updating Python bindings (if the library has them)
  • codecheck passed (See contributing)
  • All tests passed (See test coverage)
  • While waiting for a review on your PR, please help review another open pull request to support the maintainers

Note to maintainers: Remember to use Squash-Merge and edit the commit message to match the pull request summary while retaining Signed-off-by messages.

Needed to workaround a bug in cli11 2.4.2 and gz-sim-model.

Signed-off-by: Steve Peters <[email protected]>
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Inbox to In review in Core development May 21, 2025
@scpeters scpeters merged commit bdcef68 into main May 21, 2025
13 checks passed
@scpeters scpeters deleted the scpeters/cli11_vendor_by_default branch May 21, 2025 20:08
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In review to Done in Core development May 21, 2025
scpeters added a commit that referenced this pull request May 23, 2025
This reverts commit bdcef68.

Signed-off-by: Steve Peters <[email protected]>
scpeters added a commit that referenced this pull request May 29, 2025
Revert "Restore vendoring of cli11 by default (#178)"
This reverts commit bdcef68.

Signed-off-by: Steve Peters <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants