Skip to content

docs(forms): add link to JSON Schema #37424

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

jamietanna
Copy link

@jamietanna jamietanna commented Apr 9, 2025

Why:

So folks can get IDE autocomplete, and use other validation tools for it.

What's being changed (if available, include any code snippets, screenshots, or gifs):

Check off the following:

  • A subject matter expert (SME) has reviewed the technical accuracy of the content in this PR. In most cases, the author can be the SME. Open source contributions may require an SME review from GitHub staff.
  • The changes in this PR meet the docs fundamentals that are required for all content.
  • All CI checks are passing and the changes look good in the review environment.

Copy link

welcome bot commented Apr 9, 2025

Thanks for opening this pull request! A GitHub docs team member should be by to give feedback soon. In the meantime, please check out the contributing guidelines.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the triage Do not begin working on this issue until triaged by the team label Apr 9, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 9, 2025

How to review these changes 👓

Thank you for your contribution. To review these changes, choose one of the following options:

A Hubber will need to deploy your changes internally to review.

Table of review links

⚠️ Warning: Our review server is experiencing latency issues.

The table shows the files in the content directory that were changed in this pull request. This helps you review your changes on the review server. Changes to the data directory are not included in this table.

Source Review Production What Changed
communities/using-templates-to-encourage-useful-issues-and-pull-requests/syntax-for-githubs-form-schema.md fpt
ghec
ghes@ 3.16 3.15 3.14 3.13 3.12
fpt
ghec
ghes@ 3.16 3.15 3.14 3.13 3.12

Key: fpt: Free, Pro, Team; ghec: GitHub Enterprise Cloud; ghes: GitHub Enterprise Server

🤖 This comment is automatically generated.

@jamietanna jamietanna marked this pull request as ready for review April 9, 2025 09:32
@Copilot Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 9, 2025 09:32
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

@Sharra-writes
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks so much for opening a PR! I'll get this triaged for review.

@Sharra-writes Sharra-writes added content This issue or pull request belongs to the Docs Content team waiting for review Issue/PR is waiting for a writer's review and removed triage Do not begin working on this issue until triaged by the team labels Apr 9, 2025
@Stevepang68

This comment was marked as spam.

@Sharra-writes Sharra-writes removed the waiting for review Issue/PR is waiting for a writer's review label Apr 18, 2025
@Sharra-writes
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for opening a PR! Per our “About contributing to GitHub Docs” article -

We only document GitHub products, features, tools, and extensions. We may mention or link to third-party tools to demonstrate how a feature works, but we do not accept pull requests to document third-party tools or integrations unless they were codeveloped with GitHub.

For this reason, we will be closing this PR. If you would like to update our docs with content outside of third-party tools or integrations, feel free to open another PR or issue 💛

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
content This issue or pull request belongs to the Docs Content team
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants