⚠️ Remove reference and configurations for Packet (Equinix Metal)

[tylerauerbeck]

What this PR does / why we need it:

The Packet (Equinix Metal) provider is being deprecated. While it will still be available for use, deprecation seems to indicate that we should discourage usage and remove it from the default available providers.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
N/A

/area documentation
/area clusterctl

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign vincepri for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[k8s-ci-robot]

Welcome @tylerauerbeck!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @tylerauerbeck. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[tylerauerbeck]

cc/ @displague

[displague]

/ok-to-test

[displague]

/lgtm

[k8s-ci-robot]

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 5ad261ce38d845f8a681f074018adcb8bacfb85a

[k8s-ci-robot]

@tylerauerbeck: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
pull-cluster-api-apidiff-main	f83ac54	link	false	/test pull-cluster-api-apidiff-main

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[displague]

/kind deprecation

[tylerauerbeck]

I think the pull-cluster-api-apidiff-main is expected to fail because I am removing something? But this is also my first run through with this particular job and go-apidiff so if that's not expected, any pointers would be appreciated 🙏🏻

As for the dead link, this looks like it's actually another deprecated provider. Happy to take care of it as part of this PR or as a follow up so as not to mix too many streams in a single PR.

[sivchari]

Hi @tylerauerbeck
The broken link issue will be fixed when #12145 is merged.
Then pull-cluster-api-apidiff-main is must be failed since the provider is removed, so it isn't matter.

[sivchari]

/lgtm

[fabriziopandini]

/lgtm

[chrischdi]

I think this needs a rebase to pass the markdown check.