Skip to content

📖 Docs for SyncPeriod: No sync from api-server. #3277

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

guettli
Copy link
Contributor

@guettli guettli commented Aug 13, 2025

There is a common misunderstanding about SyncPeriod. It does not sync between api-server and local cache.

This PR updates the docs to make this more clear.

Related: #3269 (comment)

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Aug 13, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: guettli
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign vincepri for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Aug 13, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @guettli. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Aug 13, 2025
@guettli guettli force-pushed the syncPeriod-docs--sync-between-local-cache-and-reconciler-not-apiserver branch from f9eb09f to 18df20d Compare August 13, 2025 07:18
Comment on lines +151 to +154
// reconciled. It causes all resources in the local cache to be re-enqueued
// for reconciliation, even if there are no new events. It does
// not sync between the api-server and the local cache.
// A lower period will correct entropy more quickly, but reduce
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am not a fan of changing this part of the paragaph, because the godoc goes from the big picture to the details/the why to the how, we are now adding parts of the how to the why.

Also it would IMHO be better to explain what does happen, rather than what does not.

WDYT about leaving this part be and changing L176 till the end of the godoc to:

	// SyncPeriod will locally trigger an artificial Update event with the same
	// object in both ObjectOld and ObjectNew for everything that is in the
	// cache.
	//
	// Predicates or Handlers that expect ObjectOld and ObjectNew to be different
	// (such as GenerationChangedPredicate) will filter out this event, preventing
	// it from triggering a reconciliation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants