Skip to content

[#noissue] Remove Jdk17Utils.assumeFalse #12237

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

emeroad
Copy link
Member

@emeroad emeroad commented Mar 31, 2025

No description provided.

@emeroad emeroad added this to the 3.1.0 milestone Mar 31, 2025
@emeroad emeroad requested a review from Copilot March 31, 2025 01:08
Copy link

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR removes the obsolete Jdk17Utils.assumeFalse utility and updates tests accordingly. The changes ensure tests no longer rely on the removed utility method, update assertion argument ordering for clarity, and switch to parameterized logging for improved readability.

  • Removed the Jdk17Utils utility class from the test suite.
  • Removed assumeFalse calls in FuzzyRowKeyBuilderTest and FuzzyRowFilterTest.
  • Updated assertions and logging in FuzzyRowFilterTest.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
commons-server/src/test/java/com/navercorp/pinpoint/common/server/scatter/Jdk17Utils.java Removed the obsolete utility class.
commons-server/src/test/java/com/navercorp/pinpoint/common/server/scatter/FuzzyRowKeyBuilderTest.java Removed unnecessary calls to assumeFalse to reflect the removal of Jdk17Utils.
commons-server/src/test/java/com/navercorp/pinpoint/common/server/scatter/FuzzyRowFilterTest.java Removed assumeFalse calls, reorganized assertion parameters for clarity, and improved logging by using parameterized messages.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant