feat: Make hover label triangle optional

[emilykl]

Closes #7278

Adds trace.hoverlabel.showarrow and layout.hoverlabel.showarrow attributes (default: true) to enable hiding the triangular carat on the hover text box.

Also adds a Jasmine test for the new attributes.

With showarrow: true (default; same as current behavior):

With showarrow: false:

[archmoj]

@emilykl
Is this PR ready for review?
Would you please merge master into this branch?
Thank you 🙏

[emilykl]

@archmoj not quite ready for review but I'll merge master — will ping you later today when ready for review

[gvwilson]

OMG math

[emilykl]

@gvwilson Coming up with the new SVG path string with no arrow was Claude Code's only helpful contribution to this PR (but it's a doozy, so, worth it)

[emilykl]

@archmoj This is ready for review. A couple questions for you —

• I had to remove arrayOk: true for showarrow in 23a8f8a due to a failing test . Looking at plot-schema.json it seems arrayOk is not supported for boolean attributes, does that make sense?

• It would be nice to support showarrow for parcats traces but it looks like all hoverlabel attributes are not supported for parcats, do you know why? I looked into enabling hoverlabel for parcats but it was not straightforward.

[archmoj]

• I had to remove arrayOk: true for showarrow in 23a8f8a due to a failing test . Looking at plot-schema.json it seems arrayOk is not supported for boolean attributes, does that make sense?

One could possibly add arrayOk to the otherOpts here:

plotly.js/src/lib/coerce.js

Line 89 in 2cac1b1

otherOpts: ['dflt'],

For this PR I don't see a strong use case for that option.
So IMHO it's a good idea to set arrayOk to false as you did.

[archmoj]

• It would be nice to support showarrow for parcats traces but it looks like all hoverlabel attributes are not supported for parcats, do you know why? I looked into enabling hoverlabel for parcats but it was not straightforward.

We could handle this option for parcats as follow:
Add

hoverItems.trace._hoverlabel = {showarrow: false};

before calling Fx.loneHover in parcats.js.

Then make the following change

var showArrow = (d.trace._hoverlabel || d.trace.hoverlabel)?.showarrow;

[archmoj]

In addition to parcats trace, we should handle this option in sankey trace.

[emilykl]

• It would be nice to support showarrow for parcats traces but it looks like all hoverlabel attributes are not supported for parcats, do you know why? I looked into enabling hoverlabel for parcats but it was not straightforward.

We could handle this option for parcats as follow: Add

hoverItems.trace._hoverlabel = {showarrow: false};

before calling Fx.loneHover in parcats.js.

Then make the following change

var showArrow = (d.trace._hoverlabel || d.trace.hoverlabel)?.showarrow;

Oh that's clever, I like that. Maybe for another PR. It would be cool too if we could just support all the hoverlabel options in parcats but not sure if there's a blocker for that.

[archmoj]

Instead of the solution proposed above,
you could directly look into gd._fullLayout.hoverlabel.showarrow inside loneHover and pass it through.

exports.loneHover = function loneHover(hoverItems, opts) {
...
var gd = opts.gd;

[camdecoster]

This looks good to me. I left some suggested feedback for you to consider.

[camdecoster]

Would you be up for using a template literal here and elsewhere?

Suggested change

	pathStr = 'M-' + pX(d.bx / 2 + d.tx2width / 2) + ',' + pY(offsetY - d.by / 2) +
	'h' + pX(d.bx) + 'v' + pY(d.by) + 'h-' + pX(d.bx) + 'Z';
	pathStr = `M-${pX(d.bx / 2 + d.tx2width / 2)},${pY(offsetY - d.by / 2)}h${pX(d.bx)}v${pY(d.by)}h-${pX(d.bx)}Z`;

[archmoj]

We could leave refactoring for another PR.
Template literal may run slower: https://jsperf.app/es6-string-literals-vs-string-concatenation/43

[emilykl]

Interesting. Slower in Chrome but not in Safari.

[camdecoster]

Have you seen any issues with this kind of calculation? I imagine that most computers are powerful enough where this isn't an issue.