Skip to content

Sample: Get Localized choice values for Dataverse record #149

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

kkazala
Copy link
Contributor

@kkazala kkazala commented Apr 30, 2025

  • Bug fix?
  • New sample?
  • Related issues: fixes #X, partially #Y, mentioned in #Z
  • Needs API permissions?
  • Has other prerequisites? (E.g. requires a list, document library, etc.)

What's in this Pull Request?

When building flows that retrieve Dataverse data, the record's choice values are returned as number.
This flow retrieves labels in a language specified as parameter.
It's also a neat example on how to transform data efficiently without using foreach loops.

Checklist

  • My pull request affects only ONE sample.
  • I have updated the README file.
  • My README has at least one static high-resolution screenshot (i.e. not a GIF)
  • My README contains complete setup instructions, including pre-requisites and permissions required

@Katerina-Chernevskaya Katerina-Chernevskaya self-requested a review July 1, 2025 18:11
@Katerina-Chernevskaya
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @kkazala ,

Thank you for your submission!
I've tried to compile it from the source code and import, but got the issue:
image

Could you please check all dependencies and update the source code?

Thank you!

Regards,
Katerina Ch.

@Katerina-Chernevskaya Katerina-Chernevskaya added the Needs Attention Something needs to be fixed with the PR before merging label Jul 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Needs Attention Something needs to be fixed with the PR before merging
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants