Skip to content

Conversation

furkatgofurov7
Copy link
Contributor

What this PR does / why we need it:
Cleanup 'docker-previous-version' template and add gzipUserData field in templates
New version of CAPRKE2 (v0.19.0) is out, hence we can now remove previous version template introduced in #649 to workaround e2e complications.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Checklist:

  • squashed commits into logical changes
  • includes documentation
  • adds unit tests
  • adds or updates e2e tests

@furkatgofurov7 furkatgofurov7 self-assigned this Aug 22, 2025
@furkatgofurov7 furkatgofurov7 requested a review from a team as a code owner August 22, 2025 09:49
@furkatgofurov7 furkatgofurov7 added the kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. label Aug 22, 2025
…ld in templates

New version of CAPRKE2 (v0.19.0) is out, hence we can now remove previous version
template introduced in rancher#649
to workaround e2e complications.

Signed-off-by: Furkat Gofurov <[email protected]>
@furkatgofurov7 furkatgofurov7 force-pushed the cleanup-gzipUserData-code branch from c0194c7 to cb9e981 Compare August 26, 2025 08:22
@furkatgofurov7 furkatgofurov7 moved this to PR to be reviewed in CAPI / Turtles Aug 26, 2025
@salasberryfin salasberryfin added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 26, 2025
Merged via the queue into rancher:main with commit 6589b35 Aug 26, 2025
5 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from PR to be reviewed to Done in CAPI / Turtles Aug 26, 2025
@furkatgofurov7 furkatgofurov7 deleted the cleanup-gzipUserData-code branch August 26, 2025 11:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt.
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants