feat: add solid-seo and custom open-graph image. #3
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThe update modifies the Changes
Poem
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
package.json(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
package.json (1)
30-31:✅ Verification successful
Verify version compatibility and type definitions
Before merging, ensuresolid-meta@^0.28.1is compatible with yoursolid-js@^1.9.5setup and that TypeScript support is in place. Ifsolid-metadoesn’t bundle its own types, consider adding@types/solid-metaor updating your tsconfig to accommodate it.You can inspect peer dependencies and published types with:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash npm show solid-meta@^0.28.1 peerDependencies npm view solid-meta typesLength of output: 118
No action needed: solid-meta types included and peer dependency satisfied
- solid-meta@^0.28.1 declares a peerDependency of
solid-js: >=1.4.0, which is met by yoursolid-js@^1.9.5.- Type definitions are bundled in
dist/index.d.ts, so no additional@types/package or tsconfig tweaks are required.
| "solid-js": "^1.9.5", | ||
| "solid-meta": "^0.28.1" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Discrepancy between PR title and dependency added
The PR title/objectives mention adding solid-seo, but the change adds solid-meta. Please confirm that solid-meta is indeed the intended SEO library. If not, adjust the dependency name or update the PR title/description to reflect the correct package.
Run this script to locate references and ensure consistency:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for usage of both package names in the codebase
rg -n "solid-meta"
rg -n "solid-seo"Length of output: 214
Discrepancy between PR title and added dependency
We ran:
rg -n "solid-meta"
rg -n "solid-seo"and found only solid-meta (in package.json and pnpm-lock.yaml) and zero references to solid-seo.
Please confirm which SEO library you intend to add:
- If it should be solid-seo, replace
solid-metawithsolid-seoin package.json (and regenerate your lockfile). - Otherwise, update the PR title/description to correctly reference solid-meta.
Summary by CodeRabbit
solid-meta.