Skip to content

GACTS: checkout specific pmix sha to use for CI #7

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

hppritcha
Copy link

Till we figure out what got busted in upstream pmix/prrte combo. See what's happening with

open-mpi/ompi#12906

Gerardo Garcia and others added 4 commits October 13, 2024 19:49
Signed-off-by: Gerardo Garcia <[email protected]>

removed reference to pcc in src/tools/Makefile.am

Signed-off-by: Gerardo Garcia <[email protected]>
…hizo

removed unneeded schizo , mpich and slurm directories
add fetch depth 0

Till we figure out what got busted in upstream pmix/prrte combo.
See what's happening with

open-mpi/ompi#12906

Signed-off-by: Howard Pritchard <[email protected]>
@hppritcha hppritcha force-pushed the set_pmix_sha_to_08e41ed5_in_ghact branch from cbd8419 to 59774cf Compare November 13, 2024 14:20
@hppritcha hppritcha requested a review from jsquyres November 13, 2024 14:20
@hppritcha
Copy link
Author

@gagarc once you merge this change into capstone-devel you'll want to trigger CI again on #6 and see if it passes.

@hppritcha
Copy link
Author

We will want to revert this PR once the upstream ompix/prrte is stable enough that we can accept the updates that will fix your prrte compiler problems. But we wait for open-mpi/ompi#12906 to pass mpi4py CI before doing that.

@gagarc gagarc changed the base branch from capstone-devel to gerardo-refactor-mpirun November 15, 2024 00:06
@gagarc gagarc merged commit a6ff81c into uofl-capstone-open-mpi:gerardo-refactor-mpirun Nov 15, 2024
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants