-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 435
refactor(scheme): prevent duplicate registration in RegisterSchemas #1464
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @googs1025, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request refactors the RegisterSchemas
function in cmd/controllers/main.go
to improve code organization and prevent redundant schema registrations. It centralizes feature flag checks by assigning their results to local variables and consolidates the orchestrationv1alpha1.AddToScheme
call to ensure it's only executed once, even if multiple related features are enabled.
Highlights
- Centralized Feature Flag Checks: Introduced local boolean variables (e.g., podAutoscalerEnabled, modelAdapterEnabled) to store the results of features.IsControllerEnabled calls, making the conditional logic clearer and potentially more efficient by avoiding repeated function calls.
- Prevented Duplicate Schema Registration: Consolidated the orchestrationv1alpha1.AddToScheme call into a single if statement (if distributedInferenceEnabled || kvCacheEnabled || stormServiceEnabled), ensuring that this specific schema is added only once, even if multiple controllers that depend on it are enabled.
- Code Formatting Improvement: The scheme.AddUnversionedTypes call was reformatted to span multiple lines, enhancing readability.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request refactors the RegisterSchemas
function to centralize feature flag checks and prevent duplicate schema registrations. The changes improve code readability and fix a potential bug with duplicate registrations of orchestrationv1alpha1
. My main feedback is to remove a redundant call to scheme.AddUnversionedTypes
which is already present in the init
function.
ba7d4ec
to
68fd745
Compare
} | ||
|
||
if features.IsControllerEnabled(features.StormServiceController) { | ||
if distributedInferenceEnabled || kvCacheEnabled || stormServiceEnabled { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do you know whether there's a way fine grain control the scheme. Currently, we have to register the group level.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't quite understand. Do you mean whether can we more finely control which CRDs are registered to the scheme?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IIUC, Kubernetes runtime.Scheme now registers types at the API group level (e.g., orchestrationv1alpha1), and not to register individual CRDs selectively. 🤔
However, it is technically possible to achieve finer control by manually registering specific types using scheme.AddKnownTypes()(maybe..but not test this at all), also this increases maintenance cost.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sure. let's keep group level at this moment
68fd745
to
6a73a01
Compare
Signed-off-by: googs1025 <[email protected]>
6a73a01
to
4e98884
Compare
Pull Request Description
[Please provide a clear and concise description of your changes here]
orchestrationv1alpha1.AddToScheme
Related Issues
Resolves: #[Insert issue number(s)]
Important: Before submitting, please complete the description above and review the checklist below.
Contribution Guidelines (Expand for Details)
We appreciate your contribution to aibrix! To ensure a smooth review process and maintain high code quality, please adhere to the following guidelines:
Pull Request Title Format
Your PR title should start with one of these prefixes to indicate the nature of the change:
[Bug]
: Corrections to existing functionality[CI]
: Changes to build process or CI pipeline[Docs]
: Updates or additions to documentation[API]
: Modifications to aibrix's API or interface[CLI]
: Changes or additions to the Command Line Interface[Misc]
: For changes not covered above (use sparingly)Note: For changes spanning multiple categories, use multiple prefixes in order of importance.
Submission Checklist
By submitting this PR, you confirm that you've read these guidelines and your changes align with the project's contribution standards.