Skip to content

docs(directives): add @external directive page #89

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 3 additions & 2 deletions docs/docs.json
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -75,17 +75,18 @@
"group": "Federation",
"pages": [
"federation/federation-compatibility-matrix",
"federation/federation-directives-index",
{
"group": "directives",
"icon": "sign-post",
"pages": [
"federation/directives",
"federation/federation-directives-index",
"federation/directives/shareable",
"federation/directives/authenticated",
"federation/directives/requiresscopes",
"federation/directives/openfed__subscriptionfilter",
"federation/directives/openfed__configuredescription"
"federation/directives/openfed__configuredescription",
"federation/directives/external"
]
},
{
Expand Down
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion docs/federation/directives.mdx
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -23,7 +23,8 @@ Open Federation is compatible with Apollo Federation v1 & v2.
<Card title="@openfed__configureDescription" icon="pen-to-square" horizontal href="/federation/directives/openfed__configuredescription">

</Card>
<Card title="Federation Directives Index" icon="book" horizontal={false} href="/federation/federation-directives-index">
<Card title="@external" icon="link" horizontal href="/federation/directives/external">

</Card>

</CardGroup>
268 changes: 268 additions & 0 deletions docs/federation/directives/external.mdx
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,268 @@
---
title: '@external'
description: Marks a field or type as declared in this subgraph but resolved by another. Enables use in `@requires`, `@provides`, or interface implementations.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please replace this with
@external serves multiple functions depending on how it is used and what federation version the subgraph defining it is.

keywords: [external, directive, federation, graphql, provides, requires, key, composition]
icon: "link"
---

Supported in both Federation v1 and v2, though usage and validation rules differ between versions.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we typically write these as capitals (V1 and V2)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can differ.


## Overview

The `@external` directive marks a field or type that is declared in this subgraph but resolved by another subgraph.
The field may be resolved unconditionally or only in specific query paths, such as when used with `@provides`.
Subgraphs use `@external` to reference fields they don’t resolve directly—typically when using `@requires`, `@provides`, or to satisfy `interface` contracts.

```graphql
directive @external on FIELD_DEFINITION | OBJECT
```

## Behavior in Federation Versions

### Federation v1
Federation v1 has looser validation rules, and `@external` may be required even when a field is technically resolvable.

**`@key` usage**:
Fields in `@key(fields: ...)` must be marked `@external` if they are declared in the subgraph but resolved in another. This is especially true for entity extensions.

**`@requires` and `@provides`**:
All fields in these field sets must be marked `@external`, regardless of whether they are leaf or non-leaf fields.

**Validation**:
In Federation v1, misconfigured `@external` fields are often silently removed during composition, with no visible error.

---

### Federation v2
Federation v2 introduces stricter, more precise rules for `@external`.

**`@key` usage**:
Fields in `@key(fields: ...)` do not need `@external` unless they cannot be resolved in the subgraph.

**`@requires` and `@provides`**:
Only leaf fields, or parent fields explicitly listed in the same `@requires` or `@provides` field set string, must be marked `@external` if they are declared in the subgraph but resolved in another.
A field set is the string argument passed to these directives, such as `"user { email }"`.

**Validation**:
In Federation v2, `@external` is only valid if the field is:
- Referenced in a `@key`, `@requires`, or `@provides` field set.
- **OR** required to satisfy an `interface`.

It must also have a matching field in another subgraph that is not marked `@external`, known as a shared field instance. Otherwise, composition fails.

WunderGraph Cosmo helps validate `@external` usage, especially in Federation v1 environments where misconfigurations can be harder to detect.

## How It Works

The `@external` directive:

- Declares that the field may be:
- **Unresolvable** — the subgraph cannot return a value for this field on its own.
- **Conditionally resolvable** — the field may be resolved in specific query paths (e.g., via `@provides`).
- **Syntactically required** — included to support directive compatibility, such as in `@key(fields: ...)` in Federation v1.
- Exempts the field from **shareability checks**.
- Enables safe use in **directive arguments** like `@requires` and `@provides` without triggering composition errors.

You can apply `@external` to:
- **Individual field definitions** within an object.
- An **entire object type**, which marks all of its fields as external.

The key idea: `@external` marks a field that is defined in this subgraph but resolved in another.
Whether and how the field resolves depends on the query path and the directives involved.

## When to Use

Only use `@external` when the field is **unresolvable** from the current subgraph **and** the field is **referenced by**:
- `@key(fields: "...")` (in Federation v1 only)
- `@provides(fields: "...")`
- `@requires(fields: "...")`
**OR** the field is required to satisfy an `interface` implemented by the type
- For example, a type may need to declare `@external` fields to fulfill an interface it implements from another subgraph.

A valid `@external` field must have a matching, resolvable definition in another subgraph that is not marked `@external`.
This creates a shared field instance—a field defined in one subgraph and referenced externally in another—that enables composition and cross-subgraph resolution.

## What `@external` Means in Different Contexts
The meaning of `@external` depends on context. It can indicate:

| Meaning | Description |
| ---------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **Unresolvable** | The field cannot be resolved by the current subgraph |
| **Conditionally resolvable** | The field is resolved only in certain paths (e.g., via `@provides`) |
| **Legacy `@key` usage (v1)** | The field is resolvable, but marked `@external` to satisfy a `@key` on an extension |
| **Interface satisfaction** | The field is required to fulfill an interface but is resolved in a different subgraph |

These distinctions help explain why `@external` may appear in places that seem redundant or unnecessary, especially in Federation v1.


### Example: Field-Level Usage

```graphql
type User @key(fields: "id") {
id: ID!
email: String! @external
profilePicture: String
}

type Query {
recentSignups: [User!]! @provides(fields: "email")
}
```

In this example, the `User.email` field is defined in the schema but only resolved by another subgraph.
This subgraph references it via `@provides`.

### Example: Type-Level Usage

```graphql
type Location @external {
city: String!
country: String!
}
```

Applying `@external` to a type marks **all its fields** as externally defined.

## Tips and Best Practices

- Use `@external` only when needed for `@requires`, `@provides`, or `@key`
- In Federation v2, leave it out unless it’s strictly necessary

## Edge Cases

### Legacy `@external` usage with `@key` on extensions (Federation v1)
In Federation v1, an `@external` field that is referenced by a `@key(fields: ...)` field set on an extension definition must be explicitly marked.
This is considered legacy syntax, and the field is always resolvable by that subgraph in V1 and V2.
```graphql
# Subgraph A (Federation v1)
extend type Product @key(fields: "id") {
id: ID! @external
}
```
This syntax was required in Federation v1 for entity extensions.
In v1, primary key fields on extensions had to be marked with `@external`, even if the subgraph could resolve them.
The field was always resolvable — `@external` was simply part of the legacy composition model.

### Misusing `@external` on key fields in Federation v2

In Federation v2, you can still annotate key fields with `@external`, but doing so implies that the field is not resolvable from the current subgraph.
If the field is actually resolvable, marking it `@external` will cause satisfiability errors at composition time.
This is a common pitfall when migrating from v1: key fields marked `@external` must remain resolvable in v2.

```graphql
# Subgraph A (incorrect in Federation v2)
type Product @key(fields: "id") @key(fields: "upc") {
id: ID! @external
upc: String! @external
name: String!
}
```
```graphql
# Subgraph B
type Product @key(fields: "id") @key(fields: "upc") {
id: ID!
upc: String!
stock: Int!
}
```
This fails composition because Subgraph A marks `id` and `upc` as `@external`, but doesn’t actually provide a way to resolve them.
The router cannot satisfy queries that require navigating from A to B using these keys.
```graphql
{
products {
id
}
}
```
This fails for the following reasons:
- `Product.id` is not resolvable from Subgraph A.
- The router cannot move to Subgraph B using either key, since their fields are not resolvable from Subgraph A.

### External fields without a matching definition

If you mark a field as `@external` but no other subgraph defines and resolves that field, the composition process will fail.
Additionally, composition typically fails if a type has no locally defined fields — that is, if all of its fields are marked `@external`.
Every type must own at least one field in the subgraph to be valid in the composed supergraph.
Otherwise, the router has no anchor point for resolution.

```graphql
# Subgraph A
type Product @key(fields: "sku") {
sku: String!
name: String! @external
}
```

```graphql
# Subgraph B (missing definition)
type Product @key(fields: "sku") {
sku: String!
}
```

This triggers a composition error (`EXTERNAL_MISSING_ON_BASE`).

---

### Normalization of `@external` on extended types

Applying `@external` to a type does **not** automatically apply it to fields added later via `extend` blocks.
This distinction is important when normalizing schemas across subgraphs.

```graphql
# Subgraph A
type Location @external {
city: String!
}

extend type Location {
country: String!
}
```

Only `city` is treated as `@external`.
To ensure clarity and correctness, `country` should be annotated directly:

```graphql
extend type Location {
country: String! @external
}
```

---
## Migration & Validation Notes

### Federation v1 inconsistencies

In Federation v1, marking a field as `@external` is often required, even when it’s not referenced by `@requires` or `@provides`, due to weaker validation and looser assumptions.

If you're migrating from v1 to v2:

* Review `@external` usage carefully.
* Remove unnecessary annotations when they are no longer required (e.g., in `@key`).
* Prefer field-level precision over broad `@external` usage.

### Silent removal of unresolved `@external` fields
In Federation v1, a field marked `@external` without a matching, resolvable definition in another subgraph is removed during composition.
```graphql
# Subgraph A
type Product {
legacyTag: String! @external
}
```
If no other subgraph defines `legacyTag`, it will not appear in the composed supergraph at all.

Cosmo emits a warning if it detects `@external` fields that do not match a known definition elsewhere.

### Validation prevents fully-external types
While Federation v1 permits liberal use of `@external`, composition will fail if all fields of a type are marked `@external`.

| Use Case | Valid? | Notes |
| ---------------------------------------- | ------ | ------------------------------------------------------ |
| Field used in `@requires` or `@provides` | ✅ | Field must be unresolvable or conditionally resolvable |
| Field satisfies an interface | ✅ | Always valid if required by the interface |
| Field used in `@key` (v1, on extension) | ✅ | Legacy pattern — required even if resolvable |
| Field used in `@key` (v2, on object) | ⚠️ | Only valid if truly unresolvable |
| Type-level `@external` | ✅ | Applies to all fields on that type |
| No non-external counterpart exists | ❌ | Invalid — triggers error (v2) or silent removal (v1) |
| All fields on a type marked `@external` | ❌ | Invalid — the subgraph must define at least one field without @external |
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/federation/federation-directives-index.mdx
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ This page lists the GraphQL Federation directives currently supported by WunderG
| [`@edfs__natsPublish`](/federation/event-driven-federation/nats) | Marks a mutation field that publishes an event to a NATS subject. Requires a subject and provider ID. |
| [`@edfs__natsRequest`](/federation/event-driven-federation/nats) | Declares a query field that requests an event over NATS and expects a response. Used in EDG Query fields. |
| [`@edfs__natsSubscribe`](/federation/event-driven-federation/nats) | Marks a subscription field that listens to one or more NATS subjects. Can include stream configuration. |
| `@external` | Marks a field as coming from another subgraph in a federated GraphQL schema. The field exists on the base type in a different subgraph and is not resolved by the current one, but it can be referenced if needed by directives or to satisfy an interface. In addition to indicating data ownership, `@external` is used in several advanced scenarios: to satisfy an interface implementation, to reference a field that may be conditionally provided via `@provides`, or to declare a dependency used by `@requires`. |
| [`@external`](/federation/directives/external) | Marks a field as coming from another subgraph in a federated GraphQL schema. The field exists on the base type in a different subgraph and is not resolved by the current one, but it can be referenced if needed by directives or to satisfy an interface. In addition to indicating data ownership, `@external` is used in several advanced scenarios: to satisfy an interface implementation, to reference a field that may be conditionally provided via `@provides`, or to declare a dependency used by `@requires`. |
| `@extends` | Marks an object or interface as an extension of a type that is defined in another subgraph, typically when the subgraph's GraphQL implementation does not support the `extend` keyword. This directive is mainly used by subgraph servers that lack native support for type extensions. In Federation v2, this is no longer required to mark entity types as extensions. Any subgraph can contribute fields to an entity without declaring it as an extension. In Federation v1, each entity had an originating subgraph, and any other subgraph referencing that entity was required to use the `extend` keyword. The `@extends` directive remains in use primarily for backward compatibility and edge cases in tooling support. |
| `@inaccessible` | Hides a field or type from the client schema. It cannot be queried by the user, but the planner may still access it if used in a `@key`, `@requires`, or `@provides` directive. Types marked as inaccessible are excluded from unions and interfaces. If the server returns one, the router will either return an error or render the object as null depending on the field’s nullability. |
| `@interfaceObject` | Used to mark a type that corresponds to an interface in another subgraph, where that interface has a `@key` directive. This kind of interface is referred to as an entity interface. The directive allows the subgraph to contribute fields to every type that implements the entity interface in the other subgraph. When using `@interfaceObject`, the same subgraph must not define any of the implementing types, or it will result in a composition error. |
Expand Down